If you've read from cover to cover - that is a prerequisite - and have questions, let's keep them all here for a little while.
Thanks, folks.
-S-
Thanks, folks.
-S-
This article has you covered:Really looking forward to reading, and re-reading this book. I want to know the why, as I found doing S&S you're training your mind equally as much as your bum, so understanding the why is an essential part of it. It's nourishment.
Like everyone else I'm itching to know!
My Q&D question is - What is a 'power' push-up?
I'd appreciate any description, suggested tempo or rep-ranges. I use press-up ladders when away from bells in a GTG fashion, and like to mix up the style (diamond, wide grip, decline etc) It's been crucial for supporting my kettlebell swings (explosiveness) and kettlebell military press, when I've not had bells available.
I'm not asking for the Q&D protocol, just a brief description of one of its two exercises, 'the 'power' push-up'. That would be great.
Many thanks
If you've read from cover to cover - that is a prerequisite - and have questions, let's keep them all here for a little while.
Thanks, folks.
-S-
@mikerobinson, it's not just "OTM" - it's a specified number of sets in a series, and a specified rest between series.I was also surprised at the rests, which I thought would be longer, as we are back to OTM training, which for some can be too short a rest.
@mikerobinson, I will diverge slightly from what Pavel says in the book, based on my own experience experimenting with these protocols (and no doubt Pavel will let me know if I've overstepped here): I think many exercises can be adapted to these protocols - those "many" won't work as well as the ones Pavel has chosen, but that doesn't mean they still won't deliver positive benefits and results. I tried, e.g., with the military press - it wasn't what the book recommends, but I still felt like it was beneficial. I used light weights, light enough to bounce at the top of a press, and I also varied the weights to keep it from getting stale. Again, I want to stress these are not the best choices, but I don't think we need to eliminate them altogether.Also wondered while there were plenty of pull or ballistic exercises, there was only one Q &D push, the push up. Perhaps because it needs to be explosive. But it would be interesting to know if another Q&D push exercise could be substituted. I’m not sure I could think of one.
IANPM (I am not Pavel Macek) but IMO, the answer is an unqualified Yes. I think one can also do Q&D and do strength training later in the day - I've done that and like it.Question is, can you do some low volume, low rep minimalist strength, like two lifts at 2x5 twice a week, as Q&D is 2-3 days a week.
Well it seems to me so far picking up on what has been said that everyone should get outside and get sprinting.
IANPM (I am not Pavel Macek)
I think one can also do Q&D and do strength training later in the day - I've done that and like it.
@mikerobinson, please look again at the chart on the first page of Part IV of the book and note the timing. If it's not clear, come on back here.
Thanks.
-S-
Thank you.
So, just gone back and read the first few pages of part IV. And it states:
"Within each series, you will be doing a set of five reps every 30 seconds or 10 reps on the minute."
Followed by:
"The rest between series is the time left until the start of the next minute, plus one minute: around 1:20 with 5/4 and 1:45 with 10/2."
So, effectively, 10 reps OTM right? With around 48-51 seconds of rest, depending on speed.
I guess the key differences with normal OTM training is:
What I'm intrigued to find out, is this going to be enough rest? Compared to HIIT certainly. Compared to 3 minute rests, A+A, or some sprint training as mentioned in the book, the rest intervals seem a little shorter.
- The time / reps of the session are capped.
- The series limit the time per exercise before switching, limiting muscle fatigue and power drop off.
- There is a slightly longer rest between series than normal OTM training, but not between sets of the same exercise.
Have I understood this correctly?
(None of this is a critique btw. I love the books. I just have further questions to understand).