NoahMarek
Level 5 Valued Member
Incredible work, @Harald Motz !
Impressive recovery profile. What are you doing for your aerobic work these days?This week I had my first snatch sessions with the 48kg for repeats of five.
The later in the session the longer it takes to recover which is obvious. I really like to start, when I feel ready, breathing totally settled. I think A+A progress/success may be 1/3 work, 2/3 rest. Different days can make very noticeable outcomes hr-wise hydration, time of day, climate, time of year, sleep, mood, accumulated workload of the week...and some more.I noticed in the above graphs you started at a lower HR than in the latter one, was that by design? I noticed in my own training some days my starting HR has to change as on certain days I have to wait longer for the HR to retreat and I don't want to wait that long. I think coffee intake, sleep etc. are factors.
30-45 min of running or rowing on most days. 120-140bpm. When the Alactic work is one half, Aerobic work is the other half.Impressive recovery profile. What are you doing for your aerobic work these days?
Yes to compare these I am resting longer. A pity, that I do not have my very first sessions with the 40kg but I bet 20repeats for five took me around 40min too. It will be interesting to compare 5x20 @48k in a few weeks and months.So if we compare your latest training session to this training session from a year ago (your second post to this thread), it would appear that the key differences between then and now are that you're taking an extra 30 seconds per set, and doing an extra 40 kg of volume per set. What it doesn't account for as well is the the added durability required to last 20 sets with the added 40 kg of load per set.
definitely. from 40kg to 48kg is 20% increase, that is huge. Surely some body tissue have to be developed over time to handle that, especially the eccentric turnover point.What it doesn't account for as well is the the added durability required to last 20 sets with the added 40 kg of load per set.
I did not plan to be getting into A+A work with the 48kg, but now I have seen that it is doable, and I want to stay a bit with it to see what happens.I finally started using the 32 for all my sessions a couple months ago (sets of 4). I'll be happy even if I never move on to anything heavier, but it appears that I may have my expectations set too low . Time will tell...
Are "all of us"? No.I am curious about knee-Health. Are all of us able to run two to Three times a week without ending up With worne-out knees when we Reach Our sixties or seventies ?
A+A is, in my opinion.This thread is a pure gold!
Sure it could be done. My first A+A protocols from Al I used the swing. From the theory you want to use an explosive move were a set may last around 10seconds and because of explosiveness and muscle fiber recruitment the ATP/PCr system is used.It seems like you are sticking With the snatch, and light running.
Could this program also have been done With one arm push-press or one arm swing ?
My guess is that in the long run combining easy running with ballistics is a win-win. You will recover better from repeat to repeat and session to session because of the running, your running will benefit from the muscle building and knee - friendliness of the ballistics.I am curious about knee-Health. Are all of us able to run two to Three times a week without ending up With worne-out knees when we Reach Our sixties or seventies ?
I eat carbs. My kind of physique can only bee me. Joke aside: if you do and tolerate snatching heavy with volume accumulated over some longer periods of time your body will reflect that to a good amount of degree. You could snatch alone if you have no problem to think that that would be enough, then it is enough.You seem quite muscular Harald. Do you think that this kind of physique can be built simply by being able to do Heavy snatch, or do you think other excersises are also needed ?
thanks Stu.great to see back posting on the forum. I always enjoy reading your posts, especially on A+A.
This rowing session has the same average hr as todays snatch session almost same length, roughly the same calories burned. What is Cardio???
I find these low hr sessions extremely beneficial. Sometimes I have the feeling that it almost can not be low enough to a certain degree. It will never seem me again, that those low heart rate steady states are useless. Sometimes even MAF is to hard for me.
But nevertheless, Alactic and Aerobic is a symbiosis, period.
Or podcast!? Mr. Ciampa said that he will be in podcast #06....but, nothing so far...Any update on a manual or book from Mr Ciampa?
Works for me.Is anyone else having trouble viewing al's website? The page keeps reloading.
I'm a walker, and I don't really "ruck" much - just walk bodyweight only for at least 75 minutes at a time. As I understand it, walking does a lot of good things for you when done for long enough at a time. As Al Ciampa put it, walking and running are similar but not the same, and walking may be healthier for you in fact, but in any case, they are not the same thing. I certainly do run a bit, and I think highly of it of course. Some comments I have comparing it and walking are that walking seems to engage more muscles but running even though it engages less muscles it engages them harder. Running can wear out your knees a bit - I've had some bad problems mixing in hard core running and judo training for instance - I'd find I could run a lot when I'd run but when I'd do judo a few days later and go down to my knees that they'd get really sore and I'd feel a bit hobbled. It's often too hot or too cold to run outside comfortably, but when walking it's a lot more tolerable in those weathers. I can walk even though I'm not really feeling up to working out, but running takes motivation I don't always have. Overall I'd say if you want to get in shape fast, the fastest way in the world is probably to run! However, as long as you're walking for a long enough time when you walk, like over 75 minutes or whatever, walking is a fantastic full body exercise and absolutely worth it! I'm quite a huge advocate of walking! I just got back from today's 75 minutes walk in fact a few hours ago.Al, would loading hiking/rucking have this effect too?
I used a weighted vest for a number of years but it started to feel "hard on my knees" though to be fair, I may have been carrying too much, 45 pounds on my 115 body. Sort of turned myself into an "iron fat man". Now when I walk a do a variant of Nordic Walking which I read somewhere can increase calorie burn up to 45% over walking without the poles. Regardless, it very obviously engages most upper body muscles along with what you ordinarily use walking and I just enjoy the feeling of it, sort of like having 4-wheel drive.I'm a walker, and I don't really "ruck" much - just walk bodyweight only for at least 75 minutes at a time. As I understand it, walking does a lot of good things for you when done for long enough at a time. As Al Ciampa put it, walking and running are similar but not the same, and walking may be healthier for you in fact, but in any case, they are not the same thing.