nyet07
Level 2 Valued Member
Hello Everybody,
I am sure most of you have dealt with back development in the past and dealing with it now. I've done A LOT of pull ups in the past and my lats grew wide as a consequence. I recently read Pavel's Tactical Pull-up and Discussion of Rows articles. In this Tactical Pull-up article, he was mentioning he had seen an acrobat with wide lats but with no mid-upper back development. Now my problem is I have exactly the same problem with the acrobat, that is having wide lats but no middle back development at all. I can even say there is a hole in my upper back due to lack of muscular development.
After reading Discussion of Rows article, I was pretty sure that I need to do some horizontal pulling exercises. So far everything sounds good. When I actually began doing horizontal movements such as "Tug of War" mentioned in the article where one rows with a V-handle with 45 degree bent torso or chest assisting pulling movements such as batwings, I still felt the stretch and the force mainly in my lats rather than in my upper-back. The only way I could really feel my upper-back was if I made the any pulling movement with a wide grip rather than narrow one. In that case "the Dead Row" mentioned in the article was a better choice than the others to engage upper-back. Yet then I had to elevate my shoulders a little bit to prevent bar from hitting to my knees(as far as I know elevating shoulders is no no). After all, inverted rows with a wide grip seemed to be the best option for me because no elevation of shoulders is necessary and can be done with a wide grip.
When I do pulling exercises, I pay special attention to keep my shoulders low to prevent injury yet my online research showed that some people suggest doing pulling exercises with elevated shoulders to engage upper-back more. What's your thoughts about it? As I realized keeping shoulders down engages lats for sure and may be limiting range of motion of upper-back.
I also think it may be neurological since one may have more nerves in their lats hence more control compared to their upper-back. What do you think?
I am sure most of you have dealt with back development in the past and dealing with it now. I've done A LOT of pull ups in the past and my lats grew wide as a consequence. I recently read Pavel's Tactical Pull-up and Discussion of Rows articles. In this Tactical Pull-up article, he was mentioning he had seen an acrobat with wide lats but with no mid-upper back development. Now my problem is I have exactly the same problem with the acrobat, that is having wide lats but no middle back development at all. I can even say there is a hole in my upper back due to lack of muscular development.
After reading Discussion of Rows article, I was pretty sure that I need to do some horizontal pulling exercises. So far everything sounds good. When I actually began doing horizontal movements such as "Tug of War" mentioned in the article where one rows with a V-handle with 45 degree bent torso or chest assisting pulling movements such as batwings, I still felt the stretch and the force mainly in my lats rather than in my upper-back. The only way I could really feel my upper-back was if I made the any pulling movement with a wide grip rather than narrow one. In that case "the Dead Row" mentioned in the article was a better choice than the others to engage upper-back. Yet then I had to elevate my shoulders a little bit to prevent bar from hitting to my knees(as far as I know elevating shoulders is no no). After all, inverted rows with a wide grip seemed to be the best option for me because no elevation of shoulders is necessary and can be done with a wide grip.
When I do pulling exercises, I pay special attention to keep my shoulders low to prevent injury yet my online research showed that some people suggest doing pulling exercises with elevated shoulders to engage upper-back more. What's your thoughts about it? As I realized keeping shoulders down engages lats for sure and may be limiting range of motion of upper-back.
I also think it may be neurological since one may have more nerves in their lats hence more control compared to their upper-back. What do you think?