all posts post new thread

Barbell Fast Concentric Training for Hypertrophy and

Status
Closed Thread. (Continue Discussion of This Topic by Starting a New Thread.)

Kenny Croxdale

Level 7 Valued Member
Compensatory Acceleration and Velocity (Power) Training

The information below reinforces this type of training...

Speed kills: 2x the intended bar speed yields ~2x the bench press gains • Stronger by Science

(May 2014) study published in the European Journal of Sports Science

Approximately double the strength gains by lifting the bar with maximum speed each rep, as opposed to a slower cadence

1. To produce more force, your body uses more muscle fibers (as opposed to each fiber just contracting harder to produce more force)

2. The first fibers your body uses are the smallest, slow-twitch fibers. To produce more and more force, it recruits progressively larger and stronger fibers, with your largest, strongest fast twitch fibers being the last ones integrated into the movement. (This is called Henneman’s Size Principle)

3. Recruiting these fibers isn’t based on the weight you’re using per se, but rather the amount of force you produce. Force = mass x acceleration, so all other things being equal, lifting a bar faster means you produced more force to lift it.

4. Therefore, lifting the bar faster recruits more muscle fibers.

5. The fast twitch muscle fibers – the last ones you recruit – are the ones most prone to hypertrophy, so lifting faster = more fast twitch fibers used = more strength and size gains.

Subjects:

24 men were recruited (4 dropped out), mostly in their early to mid 20s, and of normal height and weight (1.77 ± 0.08m, 70.9 ± 8.0kg). They were healthy and physically active, with 2-4 years “recreational” experience with the bench press. “Recreational” is a slippery term. Their 1rms averaged around 75kg to begin with – slightly more than 1x body weight. So it wasn’t the first time these guys had picked up a barbell, but they also weren’t elite athletes.

Protocol:

The subjects maxed at the beginning and end of the program to assess strength gains. Also, bar speed of all of their warmup sets was recorded (both groups were instructed to lift the bar as fast as they possibly could on all of their warmup sets) to see whether training fast or slow affected their force production capabilities.

They split the subjects into two groups. Half of them trained at max velocity (MaxV – controlled eccentric, and explosive concentric), and half of them trained at half velocity (HalfV – controlled eccentric, and 1/2 maximum bar speed for the concentric).

bar speed - TUT
In every single category, MaxV saw basically twice the gains of HalfV

Bar speed - strength and velocityNotice – right around 2x the gains across the board
Breaking is all down:

So, lifting the bar faster means more gains, and it makes you more explosive with lighter weights too?

...lifting faster may produce superior gains in maximal strength.

The biggest takeaway is that being able to pick up heavier things makes it easier for you to move lighter things faster.

Getting stronge
r DOES help you produce more power, but it’s not highly specific. Lifting heavy things has a much higher carryover for lifting heavy things fast than it does for lifting light things fast.

So will you be able to throw a shot put further by increasing your bench, or be able to jump higher by increasing you squat?

Absolutely! To a point…

...actually recorded average velocities and concentric time under tension. TUT has been preached by some as a driving force in strength and hypertrophy gains.

However,
the HalfV protocol had substantially more TUT than the MaxV protocol, but it produced substantially worse results. Perhaps TUT should be amended from “time under tension” to “time under maximal tension” how much time you spend actually moving the weight with as much force as possible.

... there is a time and place for controlled concentrics – learning.

Wrap-up

...moving the bar as fast as possible probably produces better gains than intentionally slowing your rep speed...

Moving heavy things as fast as possible improves your ability to move heavy things fast much more than it improves your ability to move light things fast.

...use bar speed as an indicator of your strength day-to-day. You can use this knowledge to adapt a percentage-based program to fluctuations in strength day-to-day and (hopefully) improvements in strength over time without having to max in the gym regularly.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps TUT should be amended from “time under tension” to “time under maximal tension” how much time you spend actually moving the weight with as much force as possible
Thanks for sharing! I have often wondered about exactly that point.

That is very helpful.
 
Would the same idea apply to pushups,pullups and other bodyweight exercises as well?
 
Would the same idea apply to pushups,pullups and other bodyweight exercises as well?
As long as it stays safe: Yes. Power training is the basis for Q&D, where Pavel cites some interesting research. Apparently power training builds or at least maintains max strength and hypertrophy, while the reverse is not necessarily true. Which makes power training great for a minimalist cycle. The only caveat is, that you should be strong in the first place.

However, it has been shown that focusing on a faster concentric and stopping sets (at least most of the time) once concentric speed slows down is a very effective way to strength train in general.

But as always, slow movement has its merits too. See for example the slow twitch protocols.

And paraphrasing Gray Cook, don't build speed on top of dysfunction.
 
Would the same idea apply to pushups,pullups and other bodyweight exercises as well?

The Short Answer

Yes

Training Concepts

One of the key components of any Training Program is understanding the reasons why it works, which isn't always possible.

Once you grasp the concepts as to why something works with one exercise, it can almost always be applied to other exercises, as well.

Science Working Backwards

Often anecdotal data based on years or decades of a training concept working is examined.

Science tries to break it down and understand why it work.

However, the best that science frequently come up theories as to why they think it might work. That means educated guesses; meaning they don't know.

Science concludes and then essentially state, we know it works but we don't exactly know why.

Cause and Effect

An great book is Daniel Ariely's (Behavior Economist at Duke University) Predictably Irrational.

Ariely's research is based the statistics of how people respond in certain situation, cause and effect.

It eliminate the psychological speculation as why they do something; meaning many time psychologist are guessing.

Ariely's look at how people respond when presented with certain situations. Based on the research, a high percentage of individual will make the same choice.

The same applies to Training Program and the science as to why.

Sometime we just need to accept certain training principle work.
 
Status
Closed Thread. (Continue Discussion of This Topic by Starting a New Thread.)
Back
Top Bottom