1. Q&D's focus is on maximally explosive. S&S' focus is on explosive but - S&S practitioners, feel free to differ with me - keeping the volume control at 8 out of 10.
2. S&S is for "general conditioning" - Q&D is for a specific target, mitochondrial health.
3. S&S is designed to be done forever, Q&D is not.
4. It's not about 100 or 200 swings only - each is part of the design of a program, hence the article I linked to that varies the daily volume of swings between, if memory serves, 60 and 200.
We're discussing two popular minimalist programs by someone I consider the world's leading developer of minimalist programs. I don't think you,
@Colby, or me, or most other folks are ever going to fully understand everything that went into the design of either program.
-S-