all posts post new thread

Linear Progression Program with Adjustable Kettlebells - My Experience

Kayodoubleu

Level 2 Valued Member
Hello Everyone,

I wanted to share my self-created training program with you all, which I believe could help some of you make quick progress in the Clean & Press (C&P) and Front Squat (FSQ) using adjustable kettlebells. I developed this program because I hadn't come across a kettlebell program that offered a linear progression. With the availability of excellent adjustable kettlebells nowadays, I wanted to maximize their efficiency by implementing a linear progression, increasing the weight by 1kg per kettlebell every week. I understand that Pavel mentioned in a video (or perhaps it was in a book) that too small jumps in weight may not be effective, as the body doesn't register progress until it reaches a certain percentage. However, there are differing opinions, like Mark Rippetoe's belief that smaller increments can be beneficial.

For the program itself, I borrowed the best concepts from various kettlebell experts and created what feels like a Frankenstein's monster of kettlebell training:

From Pavel Tsatsouline, I incorporated the use of ladders and the concept of Light, Medium, and Heavy Days.
From Geoff Rupert, I adopted the concept of the Dry Fighting Weight (DFW), which I almost entirely integrated.
From Rippetoe, I embraced the linear progression and sets of fives (but 5x5 instead of 3x5) as the core component.

Here's a breakdown of the program:

**Equipment:** Double Adjustable Kettlebells (2x12kg - 2x32kg).
**Exercises:** Clean & Press (or Push Press or Jerks) and Double KB Front Squats. (I chose the Push Press because I wanted a change after many month of pressing)
**Programming:** Three days a week, with each session lasting 30 minutes AMRAP (As Many Reps As Possible).
- Monday (Light Day): Ladders of 3.
- Wednesday (Medium Day): Ladders of 4.
- Friday (Heavy Day): Sets of 5s.

The idea behind this approach is to gradually acclimate to the weight, progressively increase repetitions, and aim to complete at least 5 sets of 5 reps (5x5) of C&Ps and Double KB Front Squats within the 30-minute timeframe on the Heavy Day.

C&Ps and Front Squats are performed alternately. Once you can successfully complete 5x5 at the heavy day within 30 minutes, you're allowed to add 1kg per kettlebell and continue the program with the new weight. This can be continued until you're unable to achieve 5x5 on the Heavy Day. If you happen to fail, you can reduce the weight by 1kg per kettlebell and perform 5x5 on all three days. Then, gradually increase the weight again, aiming to conquer the weight that previously posed a challenge.

My experience after 20 weeks on this program has been quite satisfying. I did the Right of Passage with the 28kg beforehand and could 7x C&Ps with a single 32kg KB in each hand after the RoP. While I couldn't manage to press the 2x32kg weight initially, I can confidently perform at least 2 reps now (I should test my max soon). As for the Front Squats, it was a revelation that they were more challenging for me than the Push Presses, especially in terms of holding the kettlebells in the rack position. However, I managed to work my way up to the 32kg kettlebells during the linear progression.

Throughout these 20 weeks, I didn't miss any other exercises. No swings. No get-ups. Nothing else. Presses and squats seemed to be all I needed. It never got boring because each week brought a new weight challenge. I didn't stall at any weight during this time. I would have liked to test how well the back-off sets worked.

I've never felt stronger. I started this program at 93kg body weight and now weigh 98kg, but I feel absolutely fine with the additional weight. I feel fitter and stronger than ever before.

In hindsight, I'm not sure what I would do differently next time. There were moments during training when I thought it might be better to work with fixed rep numbers instead of a 30-minute time limit. However, overall, it worked well. Another thought was that perhaps it would be beneficial to do Presses and Squats consecutively rather than alternating. This thought usually arose when I found Squats incredibly challenging, and my heart rate spiked to around 175 during the 5-rep squats. Alternating saves recovery time and makes sense within the 30-minute limit. So, I would keep the program exactly as it is now in hindsight. The only regret I have is choosing Push Presses over C&Ps; the latter seems to offer more benefits.

The one issue I encountered was making the jump from 30kg to 32kg, as my adjustable kettlebells don't have a 31kg option. They go directly from 30kg to 32kg. That was indeed the most challenging part of the program, especially at higher weights.

I highly recommend this program to anyone with adjustable kettlebells. I doubt there's a faster way to progress to 2x32kg. Once you can work with heavy weights, you can easily transition to established programs like Kettlebell STRONG!, but this time, with rewarding heavy weights that provide more advantages. The best part is that most workouts took only 40 minutes, including warm-up and cooldown. Just towards the end, I had to extend the warm-up a bit because the weights became quite challenging. With limited time, you can achieve a lot in a short period. What more could one ask for?

Feel free to ask any questions or share your thoughts on this program!
 
That’s what I did with the adjustables: 5×5 triple progression, add 1kg per side once I had done 5x5 twice (every couple weeks). Presses, front squats, rows. Worked so well I stopped doing it.

But with ladders you probably got a lot more volume than I did, and likely more hypertrophy. And your sessions were probably shorter than mine, too.
 
If you have adjustable bells, why use ladders instead of traditional linear progression programming?
I thought it would be easier to start a new weight with lowert reps. So the first 1 rep wasn't that intimidating. The next 2 also always feel good. Even the 3 on easy day weren't really a problem. But set of fives are more challenging in general. I wanted to get used to a weight till I go with fives. That was the idea behind it.
 
I‘m not sure I follow what you propose when you miss the 5x5 on the heavy day.

For example, I’m on 28kg. I do my ladders of 3. I do my ladders of 4. Then on 5x5 day, I end up with 3x5, 1x4, 1x2. So I go back to 27kg and do 5x5 for 3 days the following week? Do I have to do 5x5 on all 3 days before I can try 28kg again? Which I’m assuming starts up again with ladders of 3?

If so, I get what you’re going for. But I think I’d change the reset a bit. Maybe add some GreySkull flavor to it with an AMRAP. Plus I’d drop more than 1kg. Since you can do 1kg increments, I’d drop 10%. So if I missed 28kg, I’d drop 2.8kg to 25kg. Then the schedule stays the same with the premise that you could look back at your log and see the last time you did 25 on ladders of 3, you got 8 rounds. So this time you want to get at least 9 but preferably 10+. Set a new PR. The heavy day (until I got back to my failed weight) I’d switch to 4x5, 1x5+. Really go ham on that AMRAP and push past 25 reps if you can. So set a new PR with an old weight.
 
I‘m not sure I follow what you propose when you miss the 5x5 on the heavy day.

For example, I’m on 28kg. I do my ladders of 3. I do my ladders of 4. Then on 5x5 day, I end up with 3x5, 1x4, 1x2. So I go back to 27kg and do 5x5 for 3 days the following week? Do I have to do 5x5 on all 3 days before I can try 28kg again? Which I’m assuming starts up again with ladders of 3?

If so, I get what you’re going for. But I think I’d change the reset a bit. Maybe add some GreySkull flavor to it with an AMRAP. Plus I’d drop more than 1kg. Since you can do 1kg increments, I’d drop 10%. So if I missed 28kg, I’d drop 2.8kg to 25kg. Then the schedule stays the same with the premise that you could look back at your log and see the last time you did 25 on ladders of 3, you got 8 rounds. So this time you want to get at least 9 but preferably 10+. Set a new PR. The heavy day (until I got back to my failed weight) I’d switch to 4x5, 1x5+. Really go ham on that AMRAP and push past 25 reps if you can. So set a new PR with an old weight.
The intention behind this was to return to a weight that one has previously managed and then work on sets of fives. I thought that the volume should not be too high to avoid unnecessary delays in recovery and to stay as close as possible to the maximum weight, so ideally, you can continue with the linear progression the following week. The very first concept I had created was structured so that I would drop back by 2kg and then simply continue the program, attempting to improve PRs, much like you described. However, later on, I changed the concept to the 3 days of 5x5 because during training, I felt that the sets of five demanded more and provided more benefits than ladders of 3 or even ladders of 4. That's why I preferred to work on sets of five for the back-off sets (drop sets) rather than ladders, even though ladders might potentially offer more overall volume. However, in my program, I didn't have to use the back-off sets because I could continue to increase the weight until the end and always met the requirements. Therefore, I haven't had the opportunity to experience which concept works better for drop sets. I suspect both would work well since even with a 10% decrease, you can still work with heavy weights and have more time to become familiar with that weight range.
 
I thought it would be easier to start a new weight with lowert reps. So the first 1 rep wasn't that intimidating. The next 2 also always feel good. Even the 3 on easy day weren't really a problem. But set of fives are more challenging in general. I wanted to get used to a weight till I go with fives. That was the idea behind it.

Sounds like warm up sets vs working sets
 
They do.

But they're also used as a modality to deal with lack of ability to incrementally add weight every week --- instead you add volume.

If you have adjustable KBs, you can use BB-style programming.
Some barbell programmes include ladders, e.g.
why use ladders instead of traditional linear progression
Why not? It's one option.
 
Back
Top Bottom