If we are talking about possible real life encounters I'd say it really doesn't matter which MA you practice. In a 1vs1 against average Joe the MA practioner will most likely win, because he at least knows some moves that can hurt the other, some to defend himself and he'll overall will have a better balance and "movement prediction" (can't find a better word now).Very good points about the problems with over emphasis on ground fighting. The elephant in the room regarding Martial Arts is twofold: multiple assailants and weapons. Either way going to the ground invites suicide. A special advantage of judo is that no one can hold you or control you leaving you free to run away or to do whatever else you want to do.
Unless you have family members to protect.If we are talking about possible real life encounters I'd say it really doesn't matter which MA you practice. In a 1vs1 against average Joe the MA practioner will most likely win, because he at least knows some moves that can hurt the other, some to defend himself and he'll overall will have a better balance and "movement prediction" (can't find a better word now).
The best "MA" for a fight in general and particulary against armed foes or multiple foes is
1. a good sense of avoiding situations like that and
2. the 400m dash, because it's better to swallow your ego, run away and live than engaging in a possibly deadly fight.
Unless you have family members to protect.
Also, it's about unleashing your pitiless aggression.That's why I train for fast hit and away, or fast hit and stay in it till they're down. Something else I picked up from my first instructor. To paraphrase:
"This isn't sport, win or lose it's going to be over fast, the longer it goes on the more chances a lesser trained opponent has to tag me."
Back in the day we all would get together for sparring, different styles and skill levels. Even tougher untrained folk don't hold up well against trained. Though on the street, the mental ability to "get it on" and even to recognize its indeed "go time" and talk is over or never entered into the equation is almost more important.
That can be a real problem. People get too confident, because they practice MA and instead of avoiding the fight or running away they think that they can get into the fight and come out on top...and then they get hurt or killed. A good self-defence instructor tells you 10000 times that even though he tought you how to defend yourself, avoiding the fight always has to be your number 1 objective.It was scary to see a lot of guys I trained with walking around convinced they could actually execute some of this stuff. Good for the ego, but if push came to shove I dread to think how it would pan out
I'm with you and him. For me it would be a last resort kind of thing, but I share his opinion that the one who strikes first has a massive advantage in a "street fight".That's pretty controversial over here and it's certainly not something I would use unless I felt my own life or my families was in danger.
I think this is for good reason. BJJ is safe yet good exercise, and on top of that it has very engaging interesting rules. Judo isn't safe, is painful, and the rules are complicated, and I wouldn't say it's better exercise - about the same. I do think that judo is a better overall fighting system because it has enough time spent standing up and fighting from there. Only being comfortable fighting from your knees or you back is really not good.I did a bit of Judo as a child but a lot of the clubs here struggle for numbers as BJJ has made inroads into attracting younger members. It's a fantastic Martial Art and a lot of the men that I know who still compete are well into their 50's. Funny enough they have a kettlebell type physique if such a thing exists, powerful shoulders and forearms with insane grip strength.