I think the "party line" at Strong First is that the barbell is like the M16 and the kettlebell is like the AK47 - in other words, actually the barbell is the better tool, but it's a more delicate one and trickier to access, store, etc.Well my goals is to look strong and be strong but also feel good. I have no need to lift big numbers to impress somebody. I rather feel energized by my training than beaten up by it.
Do you use the 2handswing or the one hand swing?I think the "party line" at Strong First is that the barbell is like the M16 and the kettlebell is like the AK47 - in other words, actually the barbell is the better tool, but it's a more delicate one and trickier to access, store, etc.
I do the S&S programme with the 40kg bell and it achieves for me the goals you mention above.
a bold claim.I think the "party line" at Strong First is that the barbell is like the M16 and the kettlebell is like the AK47 - in other words, actually the barbell is the better tool
How was your experience? Fat loss, conditioning etc.I had a succesful run with Kettlebell burn 2.0 from Geoff Neupert a while back. Im going back to that program. It was awesome.
I think the article explained that you can load more weight onto a barbell and that you can do it incrementally, which makes it the better strength tool in the end. Also regarding presses, Pavel advocates for the bench press as the best one.a bold claim.
Aha! This is a big topic. In my case I do 3 sets of 10 2h swings with the 40kg kettlebell and then 10 sets of 10 1h swings. Then I do the 5 sets of 2 getups.Do you use the 2handswing or the one hand swing?
I didnt loose any wheight but i lost one size in my pants,gained muscle and alot of strenght. My conditioning became alot betterHow was your experience? Fat loss, conditioning etc.
Geoff told me that you can even use it as a hypertrophy routine, just don't follow the diet plan in Burn 2.0 and eat for mass instead.
sometimes it is easy to fool yourself by thinking that doing more gives better results but to often its the other way around.I was thinking of ditching barbell too, but then I started to think what if I want to do cycle of PTTP or something similar in the future. I think I'm going to keep it for a while.
I have done similar in the past. I did Rippetoe's Starting Strength. I did sometimes Pendlay rows instead of power cleans. Good programs both.Ive been following stronglifts 5*5 and thant means squats,bench,overhead press,rows and deadlifts.
Now when you say it i feel the exact same thing. I have also noticed i focus more on techniques rather than adding wheights.+1 for kettlebell burn extreme. I have moved to KB's for most of my training as I simply can't get time to go the gym. When I use barbells I get fixated on adding weight and it takes its toll on recovery. With KB I tend to focus more on technique and I don't have recovery issues unless it's high volume. For a work life balance and having a busy family life KB's are hard to beat.
For the same volume, muscle is heavier than fat, so I think this is why you lost pant size but not weight.I didnt loose any wheight but i lost one size in my pants,gained muscle and alot of strenght. My conditioning became alot better
Like the comparison between the S&S and ROP programmes. S&S is less but are you really losing much by that?sometimes it is easy to fool yourself by thinking that doing more gives better results but to often its the other way around.