Something regarding information presentation and debate strategies rather than the content of the debate itself:
Posting a video where "it is assumed the viewer understands exactly what they mean when they use these terms" and siding with their argument ( whether "right" or "wrong") would be bit like a gymnast or follower of Ido Portal coming in here and saying that either of those methods was best for SnC. This isn't a gymnastics or "movement culture" forum, so I wouldn't expect people to understand the context. While many people here DO understand the barbell, they also were not part of the conversation in previous videos by Sika. They may have mentioned that they were responding to viewers' questions, but we did not have access to the specifics of those questions. Rather, we had a vague presentation of "what's best for elite SnC."
I don't actually disagree with the points being made (for the most part), rather, it was the vague presentation of the argument that threw me for a loop. A little elaboration likely would have made the discussion a bit smoother.
Two cents