all posts post new thread

Nutrition The MATADOR Weight Loss Diet

Kenny Croxdale

Level 7 Valued Member
The Matator Weight Loss Diet

This is an interesting review by James Krieger, RD regarding The Matador Diet and comparisons to a Continuous Calore Restriction.

Adhearance

Per Krieger, most likely on of the primary reasons is that The MATADOR Weight Loss Diet can be maintained is due the fact that individuals "know they only have to diet for two week at a time". This makes sense.

Based on his analysis, it doesn't appear that it is due Adaptative Thermogenesis. However, Krieger does not complete rule out.

Now let's look at...


ADAPTIVE THERMOGENESIS

This has to do with The General Adaptation Synrome. The body learn and adaptes to survive.

When there is a decrease of calorie intake, the body will eventually go into survival mode. It lowers your Metabolic Rate to ensure that you don't starve to death.

Periodization Strength Training Programs

The foundation of a well written Strength Training Program is built on The General Adaptaion Syndrome, as well.

The General Adatation System (Hans Selye, M.D., PhD research) basically determined when exposed to a mild form of a disease, the body developed antibodies to survive to any additional exposure to the disease.

The foundation of vaccines are built on this premise.


Based on other research and anecdotal data, Adaptative Thermogenics (The General Adaptation) is one of the fundamental mechanism for losing weight or gaining weight, if that is your objective.

Thus, when there is a decrease of calorie intake, the body will eventually go into survival mode. It lowers your Metabolic Rate so that to ensure that you don't starve to death.

The MATADOR Diet Bottom Line

As with many things. why it work is not complete clear.

With that said. Kriegers Summar below of The MADATOR Weight Loss Diet stated that it produced a dra,matic decrease in body weight and body fat.

RESEARCH REVIEW: INTERMITTENT VS. CONTINUOUS CALORIE RESTRICTION FOR FAT LOS
Research Review: Intermittent vs. Continuous Calorie Restriction for Fat Loss

Continuous Or Intermittent Calorie Deficits: Which Is Better For Fat Loss
Research Review: Intermittent vs. Continuous Calorie Restriction for Fat Loss

Summary of Findings 33:50 Minute Mark

Intermittent Dieting (2 weeks of dieting, interspersed with 2 week of maintenance) resulted in approximately 50% of greater weight and fat loss than continuing dieting. even though the total number of weeks in an energy deficit were the same (16 weeks).''

Adherence may be better in the intermittent group since they know they only have to diet for two week at a time.

  • Better adherence in this group would explain the more rapid initial weight loss.
  • More rapid weight loss may increase long term motivation, leading to long term adherence.
  • Weight loss in the intermittent group closely matched weight loss for the prescribed energy deficit.
  • There may be physiological benefits to intermittent restriction in terms of satiety.
=
Energy Restriction Improves Weight Loss Efficiency In Obese Men: The MATADOR Study
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Feb; 42(2): 129–138. Published online 2017 Sep 19. Prepublished online 2017 Aug 17. Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADOR study
 
@Kenny Croxdale Thanks Kenny, will do some more reading and give matador a try. I think you've put up other information about matador I will search and find it.

Have been in caloric deficit for 9 weeks, burnt off 6kg by adding a bike ride most mornings, eating less, but staying at 150 to 180gm protein per day. 90kg down to 84kg, will have a go at the 2weeks on 2 weeks off discussed above.
 
The Matator Weight Loss Diet

This is an interesting review by James Krieger, RD regarding The Matador Diet and comparisons to a Continuous Calore Restriction.

Adhearance

Per Krieger, most likely on of the primary reasons is that The MATADOR Weight Loss Diet can be maintained is due the fact that individuals "know they only have to diet for two week at a time". This makes sense.

Based on his analysis, it doesn't appear that it is due Adaptative Thermogenesis. However, Krieger does not complete rule out.

Now let's look at...


ADAPTIVE THERMOGENESIS

This has to do with The General Adaptation Synrome. The body learn and adaptes to survive.

When there is a decrease of calorie intake, the body will eventually go into survival mode. It lowers your Metabolic Rate to ensure that you don't starve to death.

Periodization Strength Training Programs

The foundation of a well written Strength Training Program is built on The General Adaptaion Syndrome, as well.

The General Adatation System (Hans Selye, M.D., PhD research) basically determined when exposed to a mild form of a disease, the body developed antibodies to survive to any additional exposure to the disease.

The foundation of vaccines are built on this premise.


Based on other research and anecdotal data, Adaptative Thermogenics (The General Adaptation) is one of the fundamental mechanism for losing weight or gaining weight, if that is your objective.

Thus, when there is a decrease of calorie intake, the body will eventually go into survival mode. It lowers your Metabolic Rate so that to ensure that you don't starve to death.

The MATADOR Diet Bottom Line

As with many things. why it work is not complete clear.

With that said. Kriegers Summar below of The MADATOR Weight Loss Diet stated that it produced a dra,matic decrease in body weight and body fat.

RESEARCH REVIEW: INTERMITTENT VS. CONTINUOUS CALORIE RESTRICTION FOR FAT LOS
Research Review: Intermittent vs. Continuous Calorie Restriction for Fat Loss

Continuous Or Intermittent Calorie Deficits: Which Is Better For Fat Loss
Research Review: Intermittent vs. Continuous Calorie Restriction for Fat Loss

Summary of Findings 33:50 Minute Mark

Intermittent Dieting (2 weeks of dieting, interspersed with 2 week of maintenance) resulted in approximately 50% of greater weight and fat loss than continuing dieting. even though the total number of weeks in an energy deficit were the same (16 weeks).''

Adherence may be better in the intermittent group since they know they only have to diet for two week at a time.

  • Better adherence in this group would explain the more rapid initial weight loss.
  • More rapid weight loss may increase long term motivation, leading to long term adherence.
  • Weight loss in the intermittent group closely matched weight loss for the prescribed energy deficit.
  • There may be physiological benefits to intermittent restriction in terms of satiety.
=
Energy Restriction Improves Weight Loss Efficiency In Obese Men: The MATADOR Study
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Feb; 42(2): 129–138. Published online 2017 Sep 19. Prepublished online 2017 Aug 17. Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADOR study
So to put this into action steps would it be like:
Do three day recall to estimate maintenance calories.
Subtract 30% and comply to that limit for two weeks, switch to previous maintenance for two weeks, continue until goal weight. Recalculating maintenance if progress stalls.
 
So to put this into action steps would it be like:
Do three day recall to estimate maintenance calories.
Yes

Subtract 30% and comply to that limit for two weeks, switch to previous maintenance for two weeks, continue until goal weight. Recalculating maintenance if progress stalls.
20% Calorie Reduction

A calorie reduction of approximately in the 20% area is recommended.

Two Weeks

Rotating Calorie Intake about every two week is what the MATADOR research indicated.

Another method would be to say on the lower calorie diet until it stops working. Then increase it.
 
Back
Top Bottom