MaxF
Level 1 Valued Member
I'm not understanding Plan Strong 50. For the intents of what I am asking, relate all Plan Strong 50 references from a hypertrophy prioritization standpoint.
Is the competition period of Plan Strong 50 considered competitive peaking, strengthening the muscle gained during the prep period, some further hypertrophy, or a non-optimal peak meant to find new maxes for calculations?
Would a plan that rotates hypertrophy with strength building effectively (and simply) be organized as:
PS 50 prep month(s) > PS 50 comp month > transition week(s) > PS 70 prep month(s) > PS 70 comp month > transition week(s) > repeat....?
Would you also maintain a minimum rest time of 2 mins as stated in the manual? In more mainstream hypertrophy plans, 2 mins would be considered a lifetime. If so, I image the volume itself will still bring a sufficient stimulus.
Some of this might seem basic, but I don't consider myself well versed in hypertrophy focused plans.
Is the competition period of Plan Strong 50 considered competitive peaking, strengthening the muscle gained during the prep period, some further hypertrophy, or a non-optimal peak meant to find new maxes for calculations?
Would a plan that rotates hypertrophy with strength building effectively (and simply) be organized as:
PS 50 prep month(s) > PS 50 comp month > transition week(s) > PS 70 prep month(s) > PS 70 comp month > transition week(s) > repeat....?
Would you also maintain a minimum rest time of 2 mins as stated in the manual? In more mainstream hypertrophy plans, 2 mins would be considered a lifetime. If so, I image the volume itself will still bring a sufficient stimulus.
Some of this might seem basic, but I don't consider myself well versed in hypertrophy focused plans.