silveraw
Level 9 Valued Member
I think that is pretty spot on. Over time, most people should probably be hitting a range of intensities, sets, and reps.There is zero need to train at any one %, rep or set range and many reasons not to.
I think that is pretty spot on. Over time, most people should probably be hitting a range of intensities, sets, and reps.There is zero need to train at any one %, rep or set range and many reasons not to.
Strength vs Hypertrophy
They essentially are polar opposites.
Information on this has been posted.
Let's go over that information once more.
Hypertrophy Training
This Training Protocol works for increasing muscle mass.
Hypertrophy Training falls more into the category of Endurance Training.
If an individual only performs Hypertrophy Training, nothing else, it comes at the expense of a decrease in Maximum Strength, Power and Speed.
As someone once said, "Bodybuilder look like Tarzan and train like Jane".
By the same token, if Maximum Strength Training is only employed, it comes at the expense a decrease in Hypertrophy and Endurance.
However, Hypertrophy Training can enhance Maximum Strength and Maximum Strength can contribute to Hypertrophy in a well written/executed program.
Completely Different Training
They are trained differently
Maximum Strength raining
1) Low Reps of 1-5 Per Set
2) Load of 85% of 1 Repetition Max
3) Long Rest Period between Sets of 3 Minutes; Pavel has stated that even longer Rest Periods of 15 Minutes may required between Heavy Set.
Hypertrophy Training
1) Moderate to High Repetition of 8 - 20 or more Per Set
2) Load of 60-80% of 1 Repetition Max
3) Short Rest Period between Sets of 60 Seconds.
Short Rest Periods ensure "The Pump" is maintained; which elicits a downstream anabolic effect.
Volume Training
Some individual respond well when the Volume is increased...
Low Volume/High Intensity
I respond better to Low Volume/High Intensity Training.
The Same Response
Like you, when I've increased Volume, I have gone backwards.
Overly Ambitious
To often individual are Overly Ambitions believing "More is better".
As you essentially stated, more is often detrimental.
It leads to OverTraining.
Chris Thibaudeau
Thibaudeau provide a interesting information on training based on your Neuro Type.
Below is the Cliff Note Breakdown...
Barbell - Chris Thibaudeau's Neuro Training Type
Chris Thibaudeau is one of the better Strength Coaches. Below is some information on training based on your Neuro Type and my Cliff Notes on each. Kenny Croxdale Introduction to Neurotyping - The Type 1A Profile 1) Intensity describes them. 2) They get more muscular by becoming stronger. 3)...www.strongfirst.com
The Synergist Effect of Training Various Strength
This was just covered in a previous post.
Research as well as anecdotal data have demonstrated the implementation of Different Type Of Strength into a program elicits a greater Training Response.
Block Training as well as Conjugate Training are two proven method that work.
I do this also, but getting to deep into the higher reps and increased sets has to be limited for me. I like working up to a heavy single or 3 and then back the weights down for 2-3x3-6 for the majority of my work. I was dropping back down to around the 70% range for higher rep sets for a good bit but it just wasn’t doing the job.I think that is pretty spot on. Over time, most people should probably be hitting a range of intensities, sets, and reps.
It’s not so much an argument as a discussion but I do think the details matter…. The high volume low rest to hypertrophy approach you mention is a really inefficient way to achieve hypertrophy. Of course many ways will yield some hypertrophic response, just as you might arrive at your destination by leaving your house and walking round and round until you find it, but other ways are better. Many of the mechanisms we believed drove hypertrophy are looking less and less valid and there are emerging models that look increasingly strong. So it’s still worthy of discussionIt's not complicated and I'm surprised there's even an argument on here. I suspect we're arguing on a misunderstanding. Strength and hypertrophy exist on a continuum. This is where the notion of polar opposite comes from. At one end of the continuum you can build strength without appreciable hypertrophy and at the other end you can build hypertrophy without appreciable strength. If your goal is strength but not hypertrophy you will go about your workout in a certain way (e.g. PTTP). And if your goal is hypertrophy but not strength you will choose a different way (e.g. GVT). And if your goal is strength AND hypertrophy you will choose a different way again (e.g. StrongLifts). That is hardly controversial.
really disagree with the listed hypertrophy prescription. Higher reps and shorter rest certainly isn’t the only way and i believe is a less effective way to approach this.Strength vs Hypertrophy
They essentially are polar opposites.
Information on this has been posted.
Let's go over that information once more.
Hypertrophy Training
This Training Protocol works for increasing muscle mass.
Hypertrophy Training falls more into the category of Endurance Training.
If an individual only performs Hypertrophy Training, nothing else, it comes at the expense of a decrease in Maximum Strength, Power and Speed.
As someone once said, "Bodybuilder look like Tarzan and train like Jane".
By the same token, if Maximum Strength Training is only employed, it comes at the expense a decrease in Hypertrophy and Endurance.
However, Hypertrophy Training can enhance Maximum Strength and Maximum Strength can contribute to Hypertrophy in a well written/executed program.
Completely Different Training
They are trained differently
Maximum Strength raining
1) Low Reps of 1-5 Per Set
2) Load of 85% of 1 Repetition Max
3) Long Rest Period between Sets of 3 Minutes; Pavel has stated that even longer Rest Periods of 15 Minutes may required between Heavy Set.
Hypertrophy Training
1) Moderate to High Repetition of 8 - 20 or more Per Set
2) Load of 60-80% of 1 Repetition Max
3) Short Rest Period between Sets of 60 Seconds.
Short Rest Periods ensure "The Pump" is maintained; which elicits a downstream anabolic effect.
Volume Training
Some individual respond well when the Volume is increased...
Low Volume/High Intensity
I respond better to Low Volume/High Intensity Training.
The Same Response
Like you, when I've increased Volume, I have gone backwards.
Overly Ambitious
To often individual are Overly Ambitions believing "More is better".
As you essentially stated, more is often detrimental.
It leads to OverTraining.
Chris Thibaudeau
Thibaudeau provide a interesting information on training based on your Neuro Type.
Below is the Cliff Note Breakdown...
Barbell - Chris Thibaudeau's Neuro Training Type
Chris Thibaudeau is one of the better Strength Coaches. Below is some information on training based on your Neuro Type and my Cliff Notes on each. Kenny Croxdale Introduction to Neurotyping - The Type 1A Profile 1) Intensity describes them. 2) They get more muscular by becoming stronger. 3)...www.strongfirst.com
The Synergist Effect of Training Various Strength
This was just covered in a previous post.
Research as well as anecdotal data have demonstrated the implementation of Different Type Of Strength into a program elicits a greater Training Response.
Block Training as well as Conjugate Training are two proven method that work.
I'm more concerned that this looks like it is on the second story.Sir, this isn't even reasonable. Think of the physicists who might see this video.
Long Interset Rest PeriodsLonger Interset Rest Periods Enhance Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Resistance-Trained Men - PubMed
Schoenfeld, BJ, Pope, ZK, Benik, FM, Hester, GM, Sellers, J, Nooner, JL, Schnaiter, JA, Bond-Williams, KE, Carter, AS, Ross, CL, Just, BL, Henselmans, M, and Krieger, JW. Longer interset rest periods enhance muscle strength and hypertrophy in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 30(7)...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Training ObjectiveHigher reps and shorter rest certainly isn’t the only way and i believe is a less effective way to approach this.
Training For Strengthtraining for strength is usually movement based primarily (ie you are training to get a bigger bench or similar)
Yestraining for hypertrophy is based around muscle.
Progressive OverLoadYou still want to be seeing progressive overload as an indicator it’s working, which means you’re getting stronger in that movement.
...5-8 reps is the magic, 2-3 mins rest between sets, erring on the longer side for more fatigue inducing movements...
...The other difference would be the avoidance of lifts under say the 4 rep range in most hypertrophy programs, with 5-8 prob being ideal most of the time
I’ll take a look to make sure I’m not wrong, but I believe the lactate theory looked good on mice studies, but later in vivo human studies demonstrated no increase in protein synthesis…The Training Objective
Short Rest Periods produce an increase in Lactate.
Lactate elicits a downstre anabolic effect (Dr. Jeremy Loenneke)
Dr. Jonathan Oliver stated the same in his National Strength and Conditioning presentation at Texas A&M a few year back; Oliver presentation is still available on youtube.
With Long Rest Periods Lactate dissipates. Thus, while is effect at Increasing Muscle Mass, it not as effective.
Training For Strength
Training for Strength is usually for a particular movement. However, it can be use to increase Strength in any movement; providing the right protocol is performed.
With that said, if an individual want to improve a particular lift, optimally that lift should be trained for Technique rather than being performed as a movement to increase Strength.
Increasing Strength is developed with Exercises that have the same Strength Curve and Movement Pattern.
The issue with utilizing a lift as mean of increasing Strength works to a degree. However, as Muscle Fatigue sets in Technique is altered for the worst.
Yes
Progressive OverLoad
This is fundament for Hypertrophy and Maximum Strength Training.
While Progressive Hypertrophy OverLoading increase Strength, it not to the same extent that the Maximum Strength Training Protocol does.
Synergistic Effect
To reiterate, one Strength enhance the other.
Thus, finding a way to incorporate them into a Training Program elicits a greater effect.
I'd find it more convincing if they'd caused some muscle damage per the rodent studies. Also if they'd run the experiment over a time period opposed to a single bout. Lac levels in the muscle weren't much different between groups, nor was intramuscular pH. If it was a threshold effect instead of linear magnitude, this experiment wouldn't reveal it.
See if that works as a very accessible summary
All are safe! It’s an insulated panel building! Gets over 100 on most days in the summertime. Sweat box!I'm more concerned that this looks like it is on the second story.
I think I wrote about these topics with the joints some time ago. Because for me the question of weight and how it affects them remains open. But let's compare two types of training, but not at equalized volume. Usually someone who trains for strength trains with less volume. Let's give an example of the usual training of two different men. One with a 3x5 or 5x2 protocol. If your max is 100 kg, 3x5x85 is 1275 kg. total volume, 5x2x92 is 920 kg. total volume. The other man, if he trains more in bodybuilding style at 70% of the max, will do, say, 3x12x70, which is 2,520 kg. total volume. And from here it can be said that at first glance you trained with a lighter weight, but you were much more time under tension, you did a much larger total volume and the friction in the joints was 36 times /3x12/ compared to 15 or 10 times. Naturally, some people will express the opinion that the pressure on the joints /3x5 with 85%/ was more severe, but in the specific case, if you decided to do 3 sets on the corresponding exercise, I'm not sure if 3x5x85% is worse than 3x12x70%.
What do you think about the particular example.
First set 10 reps @ 100lbs
Second 7 reps @ 130lbs
Third set 4 reps @ 170lbs
Or something similar. Can also be done in reverse. In my opinion it works better on the increase, but either way the load and rep count change every set.
Heavy Cluster Set TrainingWhen training Cluster Sets for hypertrophy, was able to use sets as low as a single rep of a 2 repmax load but with a 20-30 second rest, for as many as 5 or 6 repeats. This is very reminiscent of Mentzer myo-reps, worked well for strength and hypertrophy.