Telegramsam
Level 2 Valued Member
I am just using LCCJ for training at the moment. Massive upheaval means that my time (and I must admit, motivation) to train is low.
I have been using a plan on here where a user aims for 100 LCCJ in 20 minutes with a same-sized pair of KBs in sets of 10 before moving up to the next size, and so on, with training every day (trying to do more each time, but without killing yourself) I have used this since November (with 16s) and have put on a bit of muscle and definitely got leaner.
But I have been thinking - this program is very demanding (at least for me) in a cardio-respiratory sense. I feel that it will be at least 3-6 months until I am able to move up to 24s.
If my goals are strength, hypertrophy and 'conditioning' (i.e. work capacity/GPP) would it be better to use SINGLE 24 and aim for 100 single reps (50 per arm) in sets of 10 before moving up to a SINGLE 32kg bell, and so on?
Because, wouldn't each arm individually be stronger as a result of handling a heavier weight?
I have been using a plan on here where a user aims for 100 LCCJ in 20 minutes with a same-sized pair of KBs in sets of 10 before moving up to the next size, and so on, with training every day (trying to do more each time, but without killing yourself) I have used this since November (with 16s) and have put on a bit of muscle and definitely got leaner.
But I have been thinking - this program is very demanding (at least for me) in a cardio-respiratory sense. I feel that it will be at least 3-6 months until I am able to move up to 24s.
If my goals are strength, hypertrophy and 'conditioning' (i.e. work capacity/GPP) would it be better to use SINGLE 24 and aim for 100 single reps (50 per arm) in sets of 10 before moving up to a SINGLE 32kg bell, and so on?
Because, wouldn't each arm individually be stronger as a result of handling a heavier weight?