To Some DegreeWould you maintain muscle size if you went from hypertrophy focused training to strength focused?
Not Necessarilypowerlifters usually have a hypertrophy cycle before moving into a strength cycle
As long as the strength component were challenging and the diet was good I don't see how you would lose any muscle.
If only Maximum Strength is followed, strength is increased with some degree of decrease in muscle size.
The Bearthe underlying principle of the "cluster training" article you cite above might simply be summarized much along the lines of the Bear program in PTTP - sets of 5 on relatively short rests for both strength and hypertrophy.
I purposely let my rest periods get longer and longer as the weights grew heavier and heavier. One could interpret this as a cycle that focused more on hypertrophy at the beginning and more on strength at the end,
It worked great for me, and at the end of the day,
use high frequency and long rests to bias towards strength, use lower frequency and shorter rests to bias towards hypertrophy...
adjust to suit what you're trying to accomplish.
One of the underlying theories behind short rest periods in Westside (I won't say Conjugate in a broader sense, because I am not familiar with Conjugate outside of Westseide/EliteFTS) is muscle fibre recruitment. The information at the time indicated that specific muscle fibre recruitment occurs in a lift, like your muscle has a 1st line or A-team. The idea was that rests of under 1 minute maintained recruitment of that first set of fibres without allowing adaptation within the muscle to recruit other fibres. Longer rests permit a greater involvement of the overall body of muscle fibres within the muscle, theoretically, which means that as the fibres fatigue you achieve activation of the other fibres in the muscle on successive sets. I do not know if the science currently backs that theory up or not. Personally, I feel that in heavy sets the longer rests achieve greater replenishment of glycogen and depleted minerls in the muscle permitting greater ability to generate force over successive sets. If you go hard, there isn't much left to work with in the tissue and you need to allow the muscles some reload time. Really heavy training, and there are some examples of guys like Halfthor doing his DL training before the record, can frequently involve rests aproaching 10 minutes. There is an even greater compounding factor involved if the athlete is "Assisted", but that may not be appropriate discussion for this forum. (**Disclaimer- I competed lifetime natty, but that was true of virtually no one around me in Strongman, nor of the PLers that I was training around, so my thoughts on that are largely observational)In my own training, I've recently followed a 5 x 5 approach. I did 5 sets of 5 reps on one weekly heavy day with additional easier days each week, and I purposely let my rest periods get longer and longer as the weights grew heavier and heavier. One could interpret this as a cycle that focused more on hypertrophy at the beginning and more on strength at the end, but for me, it was simpler than that - I just took the rest I needed in order to get 5 sets of 5 with my current weight, and as the weights got heavier, I needed more rest. It worked great for me, and at the end of the day, it all goes back to my reading of PTTP 20 years ago - 5's are the sweet spot for strength and hypertrophy; use high frequency and long rests to bias towards strength, use lower frequency and shorter rests to bias towards hypertrophy; adjust to suit what you're trying to accomplish.
-S-
as rep speed slows from fatigue you'll be more hypertrophy focused.
Terminating the cluster earlier will tilt it toward power.
if you switch to a program that emphasizes strength without size (Pttp, operator, etc) then you should expect to lose some mass.
I wouldn’t expect to lose much mass at all if you switch to a traditional powerlifting 12 week cycle or do a program like 531 BBB to gain strength.
Good point, I was speaking in the simpler “lose size and some weight” sense of mass. The muscle fibers are still there like you pointed out.You're not going to lose muscle mass per se. At some point, you may lose some muscle size
At some point this may be true, but for many people in the beginner and intermediate phases of training, hypertrophy and strength go together quite well. Most people will put on mass doing a strength focused program, provided it isn’t a program specially designed to prevent mass gain (pttp vs reg park 5x5). Fair warning, I am extrapolating off of my personal experiences and anecdotes from others. Poking around i do find some data supporting this, but hardly something I would say I researched well. So I should probably defer to you.A focus on Hypertrophy produce a decrease in Maxium Strength, Power and Speed.
I'm a proponent of training diffent type of strength in the same program.
Doing so, as Zourdos research shows, produces a synertistic effect.
The emphasis of the program can be targeted more to one strength than another. Should someone want to increase muscle mass, put more of your training effort in it.
I think we are agreeing here, but I’m referencing a specific variant of a specific program that is a bit different from the vanilla version. The specific variant of 531 I’m referring to uses 10/3-5 of the main lifts during each week of the cycle resulting in pretty good size and strength gains. Wendler was heavily influenced by west side and eliteFTS and it shows in the “boring but big” variant. And the other variant I can’t remember the name of, but Dave tate wrote the assistance protocol.This is a Strength Training Program rather than a Hypertrophy Training
I would add the last set of the traditional 531 workout is AMRAP so definite growth potentialI think we are agreeing here, but I’m referencing a specific variant of a specific program that is a bit different from the vanilla version. The specific variant of 531 I’m referring to uses 10/3-5 of the main lifts during each week of the cycle resulting in pretty good size and strength gains.
That is what I thought you meant.I was speaking in the simpler “lose size and some weight” sense of mass.
Agreed.At some point this may be true, but for many people in the beginner and intermediate phases of training, hypertrophy and strength go together quite well.
I am extrapolating off of my personal experiences and anecdotes from others.
I’m referring to uses 10/3-5 of the main lifts during each week of the cycle resulting in pretty good size and strength gains.
Wendler
In my experience, running the last set out on any arrangement of set/load/reps will make it a size builder. Back in the late 80s/early 90s it was common for bodybuilding sets to be structured pyramid up a 2-4 rep max set followed by a lighter high rep set.I would add the last set of the traditional 531 workout is AMRAP so definite growth potential
What’s funny is in my hometown we were taught Leif discovered America instead of Columbus. They even had a statue of him in the park. I didn’t know most people thought Columbus discovered it until moving away.I just looked this up and learned something. Eviently, Leif Ericson was the first to discover America...which I didn't know