Silly question, I think I misread S&S: should I be doing get-ups back and forth between arms, so right hand, left hand, right hand, left hand? If so, I read Pavel wrong, I have been doing 5 right hand and then 5 left hand.
You're not overweight, you have to change some of the fat to muscle. And that doesn't really happen optimally with a calorie deficit.
Fall off the wagon, intentionally, one day per week and not for an entire month.
1. I have a difficult time rolling to my elbow at the beginning of the TGU. One tip I read somewhere was to slightly angle the bell in the direction you're going so the bell's weight can help you roll—I don't know if this is a good idea or not, but it's what I've been doing. Even doing that, my straight leg still comes up a bit. I don't know what I can do about this.
2. After getting to my palm and before the sweep, I have been bending my straight leg and bringing it in a little so I can straighten my back. To give an idea why: I can't touch my toes. If I am sitting with both legs straight out forward, I can't straighten my back up correctly—to do so I have to bend my knees. Is it alright if I bring that leg in so I can straighten my back before the sweep? And if anyone can point me to exactly what I could be doing to stretch my hamstrings and loosen things up that'd be great. I don't think I've ever been able to touch my toes.
I'm glad you posted this topic. I have started to lose some weight. I"m 50 years old and started kettlebell training, Simple and Sinister, about 1 1/2 years ago. When I was training about 5 days a week in the early stages I felt I had to eat more and I gained a lot of weight. At the heaviest I got up to about 210lbs and I'm only 5'8''. I probably overdid it a little. I was getting stronger and more endurable so it was easy to fool myself about how much weight I was gaining.Greetings,
I'm a male, 40 years old, no health issues, 20–25 lb overweight.
This is about falling off the wagon and getting back on, losing weight, and trying to make gains with Simple & Sinister. I'm having a hard time reaching my target weight so it always seems to me that I'm training with a calorie deficit. When I'm training regularly, I'm also calorie counting. When I fall off and stop training, I stop calorie counting, too. The problem, then, is that I gain weight—and it's not lean muscle mass for sure.
And I can't train hard with a calorie deficit, though I still train at least 3 days a week. I find if I try to train more than that my body doesn't recover sufficiently between sessions. So, what should I do? Just stay the course and don't fall off again, and when I reach my target weight, then start training harder? Should I try to train harder, increase weights, and do 5 days a week, or is cutting back on the training the right thing to do?
I've been thinking I should get my weight to my target (target right now equals the lowest weight appropriate for my height), and then train hard and slowly let my weight go up under the assumption that it'd be mostly muscle mass gains. Another option would be to modify my target weight to be my lowest achievable weight PLUS some number of pounds (10 lb?) to account for muscle gains that I want and, when I reach that weight, then train hard and just maintain the same weight—trade fat for muscle and hold the line on the scale. What do you recommend?
Sorry for the rambling, it's hard to put this on paper. Basically, I'm asking about training while at a calorie deficit and how I should pick a target weight. Hoping I might get some clarity here on the right path to take. Thanks for the help.
There is one other point I would like to address that I didn't elaborate on in the last post and it is about education and intelligence. A 40 or 50 year old may not have the recovery ability of a 20 year old so it is even more important to take the most educated and intelligent approach possible. I have begun to implement training protocols and supplementation that aid in recovery. I have started to educate myself so I can train more efficiently and stay healthy. Some lifestyle changes may be needed for many people. I guess it depends on how much of a commitment a person wants to make. It may require good programming if one wants to both lose weight and get stronger.Greetings,
I'm a male, 40 years old, no health issues, 20–25 lb overweight.
This is about falling off the wagon and getting back on, losing weight, and trying to make gains with Simple & Sinister. I'm having a hard time reaching my target weight so it always seems to me that I'm training with a calorie deficit. When I'm training regularly, I'm also calorie counting. When I fall off and stop training, I stop calorie counting, too. The problem, then, is that I gain weight—and it's not lean muscle mass for sure.
And I can't train hard with a calorie deficit, though I still train at least 3 days a week. I find if I try to train more than that my body doesn't recover sufficiently between sessions. So, what should I do? Just stay the course and don't fall off again, and when I reach my target weight, then start training harder? Should I try to train harder, increase weights, and do 5 days a week, or is cutting back on the training the right thing to do?
I've been thinking I should get my weight to my target (target right now equals the lowest weight appropriate for my height), and then train hard and slowly let my weight go up under the assumption that it'd be mostly muscle mass gains. Another option would be to modify my target weight to be my lowest achievable weight PLUS some number of pounds (10 lb?) to account for muscle gains that I want and, when I reach that weight, then train hard and just maintain the same weight—trade fat for muscle and hold the line on the scale. What do you recommend?
Sorry for the rambling, it's hard to put this on paper. Basically, I'm asking about training while at a calorie deficit and how I should pick a target weight. Hoping I might get some clarity here on the right path to take. Thanks for the help.
It may require good programming if one wants to both lose weight and get stronger.
I haven't met too many people that were in danger of overthinking their problem. Most often I find that many people learn a little bit and think they know a whole lot more than they really do.It's also possible to over think it. Every popular strength program works and every popular diet program works. Unless you're aiming to be Mr Olympia, win a medal, break a record or drop below 15% body fat then any approach you can stick to will work. Losing weight and getting stronger is easy, every fat dude I know who has got even semi-serious about the gym has achieved it!
Of course there are some people with very rare conditions that need more than adherence to simple rules about what they eat and how they exercise and while these conditions are rare they are over-represented on online forums, as is concern about cortisol, insulin, testosterone, gut bacteria etc.
If you want to get stronger lift some heavy stuff. If you want to lose weight think about what got you fat in the first place and stop doing it. Very simple rules that work for 99.9% of the population.
I haven't met too many people that were in danger of overthinking their problem.
Someone who is obese and weak from lack of training may be able to gain some strength and lose weight at the same time.
People who have already gained some strength will find it difficult to get stronger if they want to lose fat weight.
Once they start to lose fat they may also lose muscle mass and strength. That's just a fact of life.
You posted a webpage that linked to some studies. The first one I clicked on has to do with obese adolescents and is in line with what I wrote. I copy and pasted the results and objectives below.Lol. That is very true.
Not may, will.
Not really, no. I mean not unless their weight loss strategy is unusually aggressive.
They may lose muscle mass and strength but probably not if they follow a program, which was the point of my post. To be more correct they will probably lose some muscle mass during the weight loss period if the amount of weight lost is significant but by continuing strength training this should not noticeably impact strength unless their weight loss strategy is unusually aggressive. (After all the whole purpose of non-hypertrophy strength programs, like PTTP, is that strength does not correlate to muscle mass in such a neat fashion.)
With respect your concerns are more relevant to the question of whether you can build muscle and lose fat simultaneously (which has been proven to be the case in both trained and untrained subjects) than whether you can gain strength and lose fat simultaneously, which is also true and not even controversial.
There is plenty of material on this subject here:
Gaining Muscle Mass in a Deficit vs. Bulking (Research Review) • Sci-Fit
I looked at the overview of studies for trained individuals and most of the weight loss listed was insignificant. If any of these studies point to anything significant please let me know which one does. Thank you.Lol. That is very true.
Not may, will.
Not really, no. I mean not unless their weight loss strategy is unusually aggressive.
They may lose muscle mass and strength but probably not if they follow a program, which was the point of my post. To be more correct they will probably lose some muscle mass during the weight loss period if the amount of weight lost is significant but by continuing strength training this should not noticeably impact strength unless their weight loss strategy is unusually aggressive. (After all the whole purpose of non-hypertrophy strength programs, like PTTP, is that strength does not correlate to muscle mass in such a neat fashion.)
With respect your concerns are more relevant to the question of whether you can build muscle and lose fat simultaneously (which has been proven to be the case in both trained and untrained subjects) than whether you can gain strength and lose fat simultaneously, which is also true and not even controversial.
There is plenty of material on this subject here:
Gaining Muscle Mass in a Deficit vs. Bulking (Research Review) • Sci-Fit