Sure. But my point was that a bodybuilder might not have to fight as often as a trained fighter who doesn't look very strong.For example, you may not squat with 200 kg, but only with 140-160 kg., but if you are faster, mobile and durable, you will certainly have an advantage over the one who squats with 200 kg. Even in direct combat with him. The same goes for someone who has much bigger muscles than you. Bodybuilders or powerlifters will only have an advantage over the average person or the lightly trained. In a fight with a fighter or for example a crossfitter, I think their chances are low.
Yes, it is, as it will instill fear. But I agree to an extent. People are unfamiliar and may initially be more aggressive towards a fighter who doesn't look muscular. But! Many of the people who are aggressive and prone to fighting don't care what someone looks like or if they have big muscles. They will not back down and attack both the fighter and the bodybuilder. This only applies to weaklings who would be braver against a fighter who doesn't look strong. The other thing is, the fighter can assert his leadership by going into battle with the bodybuilder and showing the crowd who really is what. Then the respect will be even greater. Of course there are many people who both look like bodybuilders and are good at battle.. If they're also durable and skilled in weapon handling and survival, that's the best combination.Sure. But my point was that a bodybuilder might not have to fight as often as a trained fighter who doesn't look very strong.
If I’m the last person alive, I’d be more concerned about prepping my exit dose a la Hemlock Society than anything else.
Death from a burst appendix or sepsis from a compound fracture do not sound like fun ways to go.
It depends. We talking zombies or aliens?
Hoho, there is logic in what you say. Inside the group, he can be one of the leaders, and he does not need to run or climb, but simply grab and throw the weaker ones to the angry mob of zombies. In short, he will have the power to sacrifice the weaker in order for him to survive.
No, I don't.
I've done a few wilderness survival expeditions, and knowledge and skills were the most important things.
How to stay warm, how to build shelter, how to make fire from nothing, how to find clean water, how to find food, how to care for yourself if you get hurt or sick.
+1
Having been shot 5 miles from a trailhead, I can relate.
Good point. A nice abscessed molar or two that starts poisoning your brain would also blow. Not uncommon for indigenous folk to off themselves for tooth issues.If I’m the last person alive, I’d be more concerned about prepping my exit dose a la Hemlock Society than anything else.
Death from a burst appendix or sepsis from a compound fracture do not sound like fun ways to go.
I had my first ever abscessed tooth last winter. It was the worst pain I have ever experienced in my life, first time I ever had to take Advil.Good point. A nice abscessed molar or two that starts poisoning your brain would also blow. Not uncommon for indigenous folk to off themselves for tooth issues.
Okay that we don't have in common. Interested in hearing more but don't want to pry if it's not a topic you're open about.
Eh, beyond a basic level physical prep would be kinda pointless compared to skill training.
A fat guy that can trap and keep warm is going to outlast the physically fit guy who is really really good at metcons.
A bit over a year ago, abscessed molar for 12 days before I could get in to see someone to yank it. Not much sleep and couldn't lie down for those 12 days. Ice and aspirin only. One side of face puffed up from a pus balloon the size of a big grape inside my mouth. The morning of day 12 it popped on its own. Instant relief. Got it yanked later that day, was good when it ended. Excellent sleep that night.I had my first ever abscessed tooth last winter. It was the worst pain I have ever experienced in my life, first time I ever had to take Advil.
It definitely taught me to have some sympathy for people with teeth issues......
So training would basically be try to get as fat as possible while keeping up strength and endurance before health markers start to deteriorate and hone your hunting, gathering, fire, and shelter skills. Obviously if you are in a middle of a city those skills would need to change.
It really depends on the nature of the apocalypse. Many times the cities don't get completely abandoned, but do sharply decrease in size. Eg after the fall of Rome, Rome went from a million people to a thousand. But it was still "a city". Trade will still be a thing, just not on the scale people are accustomed to. So advantageous trade locations are still valuable lands.Cities are a survival benefit when civilization is functional.
But when civilization collapses, they're not and often get abandoned.
We've seen this before in history, with things like the Bronze Age Collapse.
So get out of the city.
Also complete transparency. I do own the SF shirt that says "In Case Civiliation is Temporary"..This whole thread is an interesting insight into the SF community and what kind of real world experience people have with living away from civilization.
If you ever watch the show "Alone", the "super survival guys" usually don't do very well. The ones that are OK with being alone for 100 days are the ones that win. Mindset is very important. Being OK with being in the situation is important if you want to last long term.IMHO, I think there are two things more important than physical training: skill and mindset