How often during the week do any of you train actively encouraging acidic build up by training the glycolytic system?
I am due to follow a programme that will have me do a forty second KB set nine times a week is that too much do you think?
If training to avoid glycolytic pathway you are probably running the sets too long, although giving yourself a lot of rest between would mitigate a lot of the issue. Another thought is that it isn't a forever program and in any event there isn't enough volume to cause any problems anyway.Thank you for your replies and time North Coast Miller.
In my very first post on here I talked about a routine I was then doing which consisted of swinging a 32kg kettlebell for approximately a minute and was advised that a better approach was to avoid glycolytic training and instead go for much shorter bursts for five to eight reps or so and add sets. I read some articles on here and elsewhere and they mostly pointed to avoiding using the glycolytic energy system entirely and leave these longer sets of a minute or more to be done infrequently.
The new protocol that I intend to follow has me doing KB swings for forty seconds ( twenty five reps ) followed after a suitable rest three sets of presses. The whole thing is repeated between three to five times with the KB swings being done every ten minutes so there is a lot of rest between them. I just thought that to enter into glycolytic training between nine and twelve times a week would not be as infrequent as I thought anti-glycolytic training set out.
Zero.How often during the week do any of you train actively encouraging acidic build up by training the glycolytic system?
If training to avoid glycolytic pathway you are probably running the sets too long, although giving yourself a lot of rest between would mitigate a lot of the issue. Another thought is that it isn't a forever program and in any event there isn't enough volume to cause any problems anyway.
The biggest issue with glycolytic system training is the tendency to use weights that are too light to induce good strength adaptations. You end up training the metabolic aspect and not the underlying musculature. You get used to the burn and not developing power or tension. It can also hamper total volume. Using a well thought out program should mitigate those factors.
On a personal note, factors like set duration and rep count cannot be evaluated absent the specific exercise IMHO. Some movements only develop a lot of tension in a very small part of the ROM, limiting them to a small number of reps or very short set duration by piling on the weight could expose one to injury, or you could wind up not overloading by using too little TUT for the weight. You want max tension with minimal metabolic fatigue, and that can look a little different depending. But yes, in general fewer reps, more sets, depending on your goals..
I believe that the basic phenomena at play is that my body clears acid and H+ ions more slowly than most. And as a result I've been beset with many set backs in pushing myself.
How often during the week do any of you train actively encouraging acidic build up by training the glycolytic system?
How often during the week do any of you train actively encouraging acidic build up by training the glycolytic system?
Zero.
It maybe happens a little bit by accident when I'm doing longer loaded carries.
But glycolytic conditioning isn't very helpful for my sport (weightlifting).
What about body building? Do you think it could have some application there?
What about body building? Do you think it could have some application there?
I think so, but with bodybuilding it's more about creating the localized burn; a pump, a level of fatigue in the target muscle group. That's how you get that specific muscle or muscle group to grow. When doing glycolytic training for the purpose of training energy systems we're talking about more of a full-body effort. That's why circuits are often used in CF metcons. Wall balls, then run, then kettlebell swings, etc... one after the other, as condensed as possible.
What @Anna C said.
I don't think bodybuilders care about increasing whole-body systemic work capacity, and given that glycolitic work can become catabolic if done extensively, I wouldn't think they would be big fans.
It depends on the person and where they are with body comp. HIIT being probably the most demanding form of glycolytic training out there is considered a less catabolic (more muscle sparing) means of improving aerobic capacity. it won't do much for your half marathon endurance, but will notably shrink minimum recovery time between sets and burns a lot of bodyfat.
Yep, esp if using a lot of the currently popular volume based BB programs.
I always defer to Dr DeLorme when it comes to BB and non-specific strength training, as his approach not only predates all the other high intensity strategies but is well documented to boot. As a philosophy/guiding principle it is still tough to beat. On first glance it looks pretty glycolytic but on second glance not so much maybe. I put it in the "one hard set" or "last set to failure" camp, with the volume being put in up front. It can be enhanced with common set-extending methods.
Strategies like Myoreps, Rest/Pause, Clusters all have advantage of using heavier weight with more volume and rest than just a long single set to failure. But, they trigger similar metabolic and physical effects that are good for muscle growth. Namely blood occlusion in the muscle (pump), high levels of mechanical tension, and glucose depletion in the muscle.
Short burst of KB swings ten to fifteen seconds duration
Two minutes rest ( this might be too long I will have to see how it works out )
Military press 5 reps challenging but not to failure
Two minute rest
Repeat for five to ten runs.
Short burst of KB swings ten to fifteen seconds duration
Two minutes rest ( this might be too long I will have to see how it works out )
Military press 5 reps challenging but not to failure
Two minute rest
Repeat for five to ten runs.