Eric Wilson
Level 5 Valued Member
I'm ok with boring, but I'm not the only person involved.
My daughter is 13, and wants to be stronger in order to be faster for sprinting in the track season in the spring. She is fairly strong already, she can perform a standing back tuck, for example. She has deadlifted 155 at 120 lbs. (In first deadlifting session ever, stopped at this weight rather than seeking true max)
She typically does workouts that she finds on pinterest, get sweaty routines, using both bodyweight and the kettlebells and dumbbells that we own. She delights in the variety, and she does this for fun, I do not require it.
She recently asked me for an actual program that would help her make better progress.
My first thought was to have her do the swings part of S&S, two handed for simplicity. I figured that if she could get to swinging the 24kg 100 times, that would mean that her hinge would be stronger. And she would add plenty of other stuff for variety, she has the time. (I'm not going to have my kids do TGU -- we've had one ER trip related to that, not worth the risk given that I won't be able to be present)
Her immediate reaction to a program of 10 sets of 10 swings was that it was way too boring. I could tell her to suck it up, and that this boring routine will make her strong. But maybe there is a middle path? Maybe there is a way to meet her halfway -- giving her more of a structure, without it seeming totally dull?
So my question is: if you were going to try to improve a female client's strength (lower body particularly) and it seemed beneficial to make the program seem more interesting, how would you modify the swings protocol?
I will include deadlifts one day a week, but we need to keep the weight and reps low until we are more confident in form.
One more thing -- of course, sprinters need to sprint, and she will do that as weather permits.
My daughter is 13, and wants to be stronger in order to be faster for sprinting in the track season in the spring. She is fairly strong already, she can perform a standing back tuck, for example. She has deadlifted 155 at 120 lbs. (In first deadlifting session ever, stopped at this weight rather than seeking true max)
She typically does workouts that she finds on pinterest, get sweaty routines, using both bodyweight and the kettlebells and dumbbells that we own. She delights in the variety, and she does this for fun, I do not require it.
She recently asked me for an actual program that would help her make better progress.
My first thought was to have her do the swings part of S&S, two handed for simplicity. I figured that if she could get to swinging the 24kg 100 times, that would mean that her hinge would be stronger. And she would add plenty of other stuff for variety, she has the time. (I'm not going to have my kids do TGU -- we've had one ER trip related to that, not worth the risk given that I won't be able to be present)
Her immediate reaction to a program of 10 sets of 10 swings was that it was way too boring. I could tell her to suck it up, and that this boring routine will make her strong. But maybe there is a middle path? Maybe there is a way to meet her halfway -- giving her more of a structure, without it seeming totally dull?
So my question is: if you were going to try to improve a female client's strength (lower body particularly) and it seemed beneficial to make the program seem more interesting, how would you modify the swings protocol?
I will include deadlifts one day a week, but we need to keep the weight and reps low until we are more confident in form.
One more thing -- of course, sprinters need to sprint, and she will do that as weather permits.
Last edited: