GreenSoup
Level 6 Valued Member
Recent diet-related threads had me wondering about cyclical diets that are not annoying. At least one exists!
The MATADOR diet was basically maintenance calories for two weeks, then cutting 30% for two weeks and repeating. The MATADOR study showed people did not have their metabolisms slow down as much on this diet as with conventional dieting.
Does anyone have information on something like this that was tested for bulking diets? I tried the above approach for fat loss and I like that I can just take a break from lower calories (basically not snacking takes about 20% off my calories) and return to maintenance for a while (snacking between meals again). I never particularly liked the feeling of overfeeding for muscle gain and taking a break might be comfortable for that too.
Has any study shown something like MATADOR works for bulking? Perhaps it would even be more effective since the body is not getting accustomed to the overload of calories on every day. I'm curious to hear what the forum has to say on this.
The MATADOR diet was basically maintenance calories for two weeks, then cutting 30% for two weeks and repeating. The MATADOR study showed people did not have their metabolisms slow down as much on this diet as with conventional dieting.
Does anyone have information on something like this that was tested for bulking diets? I tried the above approach for fat loss and I like that I can just take a break from lower calories (basically not snacking takes about 20% off my calories) and return to maintenance for a while (snacking between meals again). I never particularly liked the feeling of overfeeding for muscle gain and taking a break might be comfortable for that too.
Has any study shown something like MATADOR works for bulking? Perhaps it would even be more effective since the body is not getting accustomed to the overload of calories on every day. I'm curious to hear what the forum has to say on this.