guardian7
Level 6 Valued Member
The Elderly
The majority of elderly individuals have a multitude of health issues, such as decline in bone density, muscle wasting, becoming pre-diabetic, ect. These health issues are essentially something many of them chose.
It is a slow process that take place over years, not over night.
They chose not to do any exercise which maintain and/or increases bone density/bone mass.
They chose not to consume enough protein per meal/day, which over they years leads to muscle loss. Not consuming enough protein starves the muscles; muscle wasting occurs slowly for years.
Diabetes will be "between 1 in 5 and 1 in 3 adults in 2050" (Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence - Population Health Metrics)
Diabetes is a gateway disease to cancer, heart attacks, strokes, kidney failure, dimentia, alzheimers, etc.
In regard to Alzheimers, it is now being referred to as Type 3 Diabetes.
To reiterate, these health issues are something many chose due to not having some type of exercise program, consuming enough protein to maintain or increase muscle mass, and a diet that promotes and leads to diabetes.
Cudos To My Sister
It took my sister 16 years but she finally succeeded in going from pre-diabetic to being diabetic, having osterprosis (decreasing bone mass), sarcopenia (muscle loss) and having some other associated health issues.
Back in 2008 she was diagnosed as pre-diabetic. This year (2023) she was diagnosed as being Type II The irony is the when they informed her, she told them she wasn't.
Now she is on multiple diabetic medications.
Her new objective is now consume as little protein as she can and see how much muscle mass she can lose and perform no weight bearing exercise and see how much bone mass she can lose.
I have no empathy or sympathy for her or others who chose this life style of health issues. .
They own it
I have my own story here, impressive enough I think, without being quite as "over the top" as the one in the post above. (5.2?? 5 standard deviations?? Seems a bit much. But Z-score probably exaggerates the difference more than his T-score would.)
I had a DEXA scan for bone mineral density in September this year. As I understand it, T score is compared to a healthy young adult, and Z score is compared to people your own age.
My results:
Left Femur Neck: 1.104 gm/cm2, T: 0.5, Z: 1.2
Left Total Hip: 1.123 gm/cm2, T: 0.9, Z: 1.2
L2-L4 vertebral bodies: 1.403 gm/cm2, T:1.5, Z: 1.8
Left Radius 33%: .879 gm/cm2, T: 0.0, Z: 0.6
So by the conversion to percentile charts, this puts me at 96th percentile for bone mineral density in the lumbar spine as compared with others my age/gender, and 93rd percentile when compared with younger people. Pretty awesome! Especially int he lumbar spine.
I wondered, is this good genetics? My sister and mother had also recently had theirs tested. Results reported a little differently, but I think are still comparable. Their scores are good, but more in the "normal - good" range.
Sister's: lumbar spine: 1.111 g/cm2, T: -0.6
Mother's: L-spine total L1, L2, L3, and L4 AP lumbar spine is 0.994 g/cm2, T: -0.5, Z: 1.7
Since my mother and sister both exercise but do very little heavy lifting, I give the credit to my strength training. However, in the interest of full disclosure, I'm also on HRT estrogen, where they are not. We are all post-menopause. I am almost 56 yrs old, my sister is 58, and mother 78. So the HRT may also have some positive effect. Also, I take creatine supplement, and I a few studies have seen an improvement from that as well.
I have had some correspondence with a researcher who has looked at masters weightlifters compared with runners. They published a paper with their findings: Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass in Masters Olympic Weightlifters and Runners; Kayleigh R. Erickson, Gregory J. Grosicki, Mara Mercado, and Bryan L. Riemann. Their findings are aligned with my own experience. From the paper, "While there was no significant difference between exercise groups for the femur T scores (p = .098), the OWL participants had significantly higher lumbar (p = .008), radius (p < .001), and total body (p = .008) T scores, as well as significantly greater lean body mass (p = .021)." In the conclusion, "In summary, midlife incorporation of an explosive, power-focused resistance training program (Olympic weightlifting) appears to provide substantial benefits for musculoskeletal health."
I am glad the message is getting out there. Lifting is good for bone health!
There might be something "special" about Olympic weightlifting in terms of both power AND heavy load. The forces on the body just from heavy cleans, for example. I ran the double KB Giant program a few times and although my weight is modest, I certainly felt the whole body effects. I think cleaning every rep for the press is a great idea. Armor building as Dan John calls it.