all posts post new thread

Kettlebell one arm press

Status
Closed Thread. (Continue Discussion of This Topic by Starting a New Thread.)
Hello,

Next week, I will be moving on. Then, I do not know if I will be able to press in the evening. So I tested myself tonight.

My maximum after having followed this daily dose press program is now a very solid 28. I can get 5 singles on good days. However, I failed at 30. I do admit that I am a little tired tonight, so to be sure, I'll give a last try tomorrow.

At the end of this beautiful press journey, I went from barely 24 to a very solid 28. I am very happy to now pressing "that much". I am absolutely not disappointed or whatever of this kind. This program made me like a a new move and made me discover new body sensations. I did not imagine that the press was a such a full body move.

Then, I wanted to do a little comparison between it and ROP, in terms of figures. I hope I will be clear enough, and I also hope that it will help some folks to manage a press training program.

We lift 3 days a week
W1 > 18 lifts a session >> 54 lifts a week
W2 > 24 >> 72
W3 > 30 >> 90
W4 > 34 >> 102
W5 > 38 >> 114
W6 > 42 >> 126
W7 > 46 >> 138
W8 > 50 >> 150
W9 > 55 >> 165
W10 > 60 >> 180
W11 > 65 >> 195
W12 > 70 >> 210
W13 > 75 >> 225
1767 lifts in total

I assume lots of people start ROP with a 1RM @24 and achieve then a 32

ROP represents a press program with a total of 1767 lifts (ES) in 13 week. DDP reprensents 450 lifts (ES) in 6 weeks. I counted 5 singles for each "heavy day" in DDP. Even if DDP would be a 13 weeks program, it would only have 975 lifts so, it would be 55% of the ROP volume.

Going from 24 to 32 represents a 1/3 increase. Going from 24 to 28 represents 16% increase. If progression were linear, a 13 week DDP would also lead to an 1/3 increase. This means that the full DDP is as efficient as 1/2 ROP. What is interesting here is that 450 lifts do not represent an half of the 1767 of ROP. To a certain extent, DDP is more "time efficient" (there is a more significant progression in 6 weeks DDP than 6 week ROP). I precise here, that it is theoretical ! These are only figures.

As side notes:
> I ran DDP simultaneously with daily heavy swings (S&S like), loaded pull ups, GUs / loaded pistols. I never went through overtraining and was always fresh. I have to admit that during DDP, I also started HSPU training from the crow position. Maybe it degraded a little my recovery.
> For "busy" people, this program is just perfect. It only took a few minutes a day, comparing to a dilligently done ROP, which lasts about 50-60 minutes. I precise here that ROP is a stand alone program, which DDP is not.

Finally, I would like to say a big thank you @Steve Freides for designing this program ! :) I strongly advise to go for a try. I believe everyone will progress without too much pain.

I think I will GTG one or two weeks before tackle S&T.

Thank you for reading this. Once again, thank you @Steve Freides

Kind regards,

Pet'
 
I think you have made an error. ROP should be as such, no?

Code:
W1  -  5, 15, 18
W2  -  5, 15, 24
W3  -  5, 15, 30
W4  - 15, 30, 34
W5  - 15, 30, 38
W6  - 15, 30, 42
W7  - 15, 30, 46
W8  - 15, 30, 50
W9  - 30, 50, 55
W10 - 30, 50, 60
W11 - 30, 50, 65
W12 - 30, 50, 70
W13 - 30, 50, 75

Total 1292
 
I think you have made an error. ROP should be as such, no?

Code:
W1  -  5, 15, 18
W2  -  5, 15, 24
W3  -  5, 15, 30
W4  - 15, 30, 34
W5  - 15, 30, 38
W6  - 15, 30, 42
W7  - 15, 30, 46
W8  - 15, 30, 50
W9  - 30, 50, 55
W10 - 30, 50, 60
W11 - 30, 50, 65
W12 - 30, 50, 70
W13 - 30, 50, 75

Total 1292

He lists heavy days only.
 
Hello,

@Jan
Yes I did not know the tall kneeling variation !

Doing a press during the GU is also a very interesting thing. However, I GU more than I press (press @28 and GU @38). However, on variety / light day, I bookmark the idea :)

Kind regards,

Pet'
 
I'm still figuring out what to do...
One of my goals for the second half of 2017 was to deadlift 200Kg. I pulled that two days ago after not deadlifting for almost 3 years (old PR 180Kg)...talk about WTH effect.
Another goal is a pullup with the 32. As of now I can do one with the 16. Although pressing would only be a secondary goal, the RoP version with the pullup superset seems to be a good way to increase my pullup.
 
@Kettlebelephant, sorry but those numbers aren't all correct. I did spell this out in some other thread - perhaps someone can post a link to this.

What you're missing is that light and medium day stay the same for a while.

-S-
 
On weeks 4-8, the light and medium days are what you show for week 8.

On weeks 9-13, the light and medium days are what you show for week 13.

The idea is that there is a big jump in volume twice in the program, at week 4 and at week 9. Week 5 has only one addition rung on heavy day compared to week 4, and so on.

-S-
 
Oh, ok. I thought, because you systematically add only one rung to the heavy days that you do the same for light and medium.
Any particular reason for the big jumps over a continuous increase?
 
The same reason we don't have little increments in kettlebell weights, don't recommend using small plates on the bar, etc. - the bigger jumps provide a better stimulus to increased strength. I typically change my deadlift bar weights by adding a 10 on each side and my PR is in the mid-300's - I don't use the 5's or 2.5's unless I'm getting near my limits and aiming for a particular percentage of 1RM.

-S-
 
I want to add another couple of comments about this program.

Here's the updated version:

View attachment 2385

The weekly volume increases only a little _except in two places, where it goes for 50 to 79, and where it goes from 95 to 135. This is part of the key to the program's success - gradual increase, then a big jump, then more gradual increase, then another big jump, then more gradual increase up to the final 5 x 1-2-3-4-5.

For week #13, I would do the heavy day, then skip the final two sessions shown in the spreadsheet. Instead, take some time off then test for your new max.

-S-
 
123 123 123
123 123 123 123
123 123 123 123 123
1234 123 123 123 123
1234 1234 123 123 123
1234 1234 1234 123 123
1234 1234 1234 1234 123
1234 1234 1234 1234 1234
12345 1234 1234 1234 1234
12345 12345 1234 1234 1234
12345 12345 12345 1234 1234
12345 12345 12345 12345 1234
12345 12345 12345 12345 12345

Thanks for printing the formula. That eases my mind :D
 
Status
Closed Thread. (Continue Discussion of This Topic by Starting a New Thread.)
Back
Top Bottom