This -
If you now visit Powerlifting Rankings, you'll find other options as well, including both the original and the 2020 update of Wilks' system:
I agree that it would be interesting to see if and how Wilks or one of the other systems would/could/should be applied to the math of PlanStrong. I will solicit the opinions of the two people who teach PlanStrong.
-S-
is an interesting question and one that, for years, was addresses solely by Wilks points. (If there was another formula in use, I was unaware of it.) See Wilks coefficient - Wikipedia or any of quite a number of other links out there about this system.This is a great question and I am finding this out is spades. I am running Rogoznikov and I am finding is way too unintense for me (is that a word) and I think this is because my weights lifted (despite being in the proper range) are not nearly as stimulating as a 900lbs Squatter doing the exact same rep range and %. I have heard on other forums that an 80% of 600 is as draining as an 80% of 1000 because it is 80%...this is absolutely not true and this is why larger heavier lifting athletes need much more recovery than smaller lighter lifting athletes.
If you now visit Powerlifting Rankings, you'll find other options as well, including both the original and the 2020 update of Wilks' system:
I agree that it would be interesting to see if and how Wilks or one of the other systems would/could/should be applied to the math of PlanStrong. I will solicit the opinions of the two people who teach PlanStrong.
-S-