@Hung, we must not be reading the same forum. We don't address hypertrophy for hypertrophy's sake - we have no advice to offer there. We don't comment on what bodybuilders who aren't interested in strength do but we also don't address a lot of other things, so this isn't a condemnation, just an announcement of what we do and don't have to offer. If this is you, best of luck and we recommend you look elsewhere for training advice.
No one has said that in those words, but we are called StrongFirst because we believe that this is the most important physical attribute a healthy person can work on to improve themselves, and that objective, strength, is most easily and effectively accomplished using compound movements that work a lot of the body at once and as a unit. If you don't choose that approach, that's fine, but again, your approach isn't something we focus on here and you'd do better to look for advice elsewhere.
That's OK.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying, but there are many at StrongFirst who are well-acquainted with a wide variety of bodybuilding practices, e.g.,
@fabio Z was a bodybuilder before he found Pavel and StrongFirst. If "without studies their practice carefully" is what you're mean by that, then I don't think you're correct in your assumption.
Again, I think you've misunderstood. We obviously choose what we do here because we think it's more valuable than the alternatives - there is no shame in that and no judgement of what others choose to do for themselves, but we have explained - many times - why we do what we do, and if you feel we're judging bodybuilders, well, I'm sorry you feel that way, but that fact that we don't offer those kinds of training programs is a statement of what we value. If your values are different, again I must say you'll do better to look elsewhere for advice.
-S-