Why? These two exercises will do nothing for any of your goals.I saw today's messages in the thread about the Hindu Squats and Hindu Pushups. I want to GTG these.
Why? These two exercises will do nothing for any of your goals.I saw today's messages in the thread about the Hindu Squats and Hindu Pushups. I want to GTG these.
Why? These two exercises will do nothing for any of your goals.
Yep.I give up....
It's a waste of time to offer tips and advice if there is no focus.
this is my calory report for June. My long slow sunday runs burn 900+ calories in +- 90 minutes. the short hard runs burn around 400 (45 min or so including a slow warmup walk) and the Kettlebell (mostly warmup+swings+tricks with lighter KB) burn around 300 (30 min). I train 4-5 days/week, rarely 3or6 d/week. so to lose fat quickly, the focus is to just be active for as long as possible (and diet!). It doesn't really seem to matter what the action is.about 300 calories per day attributable to exercise. This is the rough cost of a routine 3-4 day per week program.
the article is blocked. looks like I read my quota of free articles from the NY Times. Maybe it's similar to this one?It looks like there's more going on than just how many calories are burned.
Lifting Weights? Your Fat Cells Would Like to Have a Word.
very interesting take. I especially like the fancy rep schemes with waved loading comment. I’m not sure why we rarely talk about straight sets on SF. I for one hadnT used straight sets in over two years. A couple months ago I started doing 4 straight sets of squats, presses, push ups, and rows… all were taken to close to failure. I noticed after just 3 weeks, I looked better and added some muscle. For reasons I don’t understand now that I think about it, I switched back to the fancy rep schemes and waved loading…. Lol.Lastly, and this is something I have applied to myself: A lot of the programs we read with fancy rep schemes and waving and so on and so forth will make you stronger, BUT imo if you a training beginner (that is, you aren’t relatively very strong yet) there is absolutely nothing wrong with doing simple things like (10reps) x 3 sets for hypertrophy and strength.
It’s pretty hard to out run a doughnut…this is my calory report for June. My long slow sunday runs burn 900+ calories in +- 90 minutes. the short hard runs burn around 400 (45 min or so including a slow warmup walk) and the Kettlebell (mostly warmup+swings+tricks with lighter KB) burn around 300 (30 min). I train 4-5 days/week, rarely 3or6 d/week. so to lose fat quickly, the focus is to just be active for as long as possible (and diet!). It doesn't really seem to matter what the action is.
View attachment 21705
the article is blocked. looks like I read my quota of free articles from the NY Times. Maybe it's similar to this one?
Why Resistance Training Has an Effect on Fat Loss
Basically this article says taht resistence training causes the muscles to send a signal to the fat cells telling them to start the fat-burning process.
so new questions I love this!
- the messages to fat-cells derive from resistence training.
Does more muscle mean that more messages are sent in the 30minutes of training?
How many more messages per extra pound of muscle?
Does more messages mean that more fat gets burnt?
I'm thinking of that Harry Potter 1 scene where the house gets flooded with letters. what works better: 1 letter or 1000 letters?
anyway, just want to repeat this current view of mine:
"so to lose fat quickly, the focus is to just be active for as long as possible (and diet!). It doesn't really seem to matter what the action is"
This is a bold and raw final sentence in the statement! I will not defend it or back it up, but I will try and execute it until I lose this 5-8kg
My fitness journey would have been so much simpler if I could get jacked from just a 2 move minimalist program!
I dunno. I could imagine getting pretty jacked just doing Clean & Front Squat on one day and Clean & Press on another - using Barbell, KB or Dumbbell. I guess that is 3 movements.
OTOH I did build quite a bit of muscle in my teens just bench pressing and playing sport every day.
Sounds like “Muscle Confusion” a la Tony HortonI've done it lots of times. Simply, I stick to a few key lifts and eat in 2000-2500 calories a day, usually fasting till lunch. I also try to be more active and walk.
The simple meter I use is that my body weight goes down and my lifts go up or stay steady. You don't want to lose too quickly, a 1/2kg per week is plenty.
I know lots of things will work and will work differently for lots of people but things that have worked for me in the past
-Relatively brief full body workouts - Bench, Squat, Row - 3x3 and 3x8 with reduced rest - or Ascending sets varying the rep scheme
-Using different implements - if you normally use KB use a barbell or visa vera - using a specialty bar you've never tried - doing nothing but unilateral training or nothing but dumbbells - switching to bodyweight - completing a Chin Up, Swing or Push Up Program... the whole point is quite simply exciting your body by throwing a familiar but different stimulus at it. My body responds quite well holding onto muscle and building new when there is a new stimulus to overcome.
I think it's natural to be attracted to fancy-sounded stuff. I also think the waving and "fancy rep schemes" tend to benefit folks with more training experience under their belt. That is, they are already "significantly" strong and conditioned. While it's true that newbies make gains on "pretty much anything," show me someone who can do double-digit (10+)sets of pullups, sets of 20+ pushups, etc who doesn't have some strength, muscle and conditioning. That's why they call GPP what it is. You start by getting "generally strong and conditioned." That, I believe, is the rationale behind programs like S&S. It's not a complex program. It's intentionally simple so you can easily stick to it. While it might not fit someone's particular goals, that doesn't decrease the value it does have.very interesting take. I especially like the fancy rep schemes with waved loading comment. I’m not sure why we rarely talk about straight sets on SF. I for one hadnT used straight sets in over two years. A couple months ago I started doing 4 straight sets of squats, presses, push ups, and rows… all were taken to close to failure. I noticed after just 3 weeks, I looked better and added some muscle. For reasons I don’t understand now that I think about it, I switched back to the fancy rep schemes and waved loading…. Lol.
Sounds like “Muscle Confusion” a la Tony Horton