Building mass or achieving hypertrophy is subjectively, because we all have different expectations associated with the term.
If you weigh 200lbs @ 20% bodyfat and a routine gets you to 195lbs @ 12% bodyfat than to me that was a hypertrophy routine. Others would say it's a fat loss routine.
For me a hypertrophy routine is every routine that has the potential to increase my lean tissue, even if my overall weight stays the same or gets lower.
A mass routine to me is something with the potential to increase my overall bodyweight in the form of lean tissue gain or lean tissue + fat gain. (-> a routine that requires high amounts of food otherwise you're not able to complete it properly, think of Starting Strength for example)
Using my personal definitions it's not that hard to achieve hypertrophy using calisthencis, mass on the other hand is hard to build with bodyweight only.
Achieving hypertrophy with calisthenics has a lot to do with your starting point and body "measurments".
Compare a 5'8, 155lbs guy to another one who's 6'3, 220lbs. The 6'3 has to move a lot more weight through bigger ROMs than the 5'8 guy. The potential for hypertrophy is a lot bigger for him using calisthenics. On the downside he will have a hard time reaching the same rep numbers as the smaller guy.
Therefore one and the same routine can have a much different outcome for different people.
@John Kowalski without knowing some basics like weight, max pushups, max pullups, max bodyweight squats and without knowing how you define hypertrophy and mass, it's hard to give you guidelines for a hypertrophy routine based on calisthenics.